AddThis Social Bookmark Button

SPACE PRESERVATION TREATY

NEWS: SPACE WARFARE

NGO LINKS

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 09/2004
Bookmark and Share

« Dennis Kucinich: "Space Activities Should Be Devoted to Peace" | Main | HOW TO BAN WARFARE & WEAPONS IN SPACE - CREATE A SPACE PRESERVATION TREATY CONFERENCE »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451faf769e200d83491554169e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES - SPACE PRESERVATION ACT OF 2005 (H.R.2420):

Comments

Citizens that wants the psychological harassment and the non-consensual human experimentation. non-c

VVGS'open letter,

To: the ministers of:
General Affairs
The Interior and the kingdome relations Economic Affairs
Justice
Education,Culture,and Science
The European Parliament


Exellencies,

We have a number of very specific questions for you, which We hope you will answer honestly.


Question 1: What action has been taken by the EU Council of Ministers, the European Commission, the other member states of the EU, or the dutch's own government, which attempts to ensure that the aspirations of the European Parliament, expressed around four years ago in resolution A4-0005/99 paragraph 27, will be met?

Question 2: What action has your government taken, or is your government now prepared to take, to eschew unilaterally, in advance of the negotiation of the international convention called for by the European Parliament, the development or deployment of the technology mentioned, in the Netherlands, by the Dutch, or affecting dutch UN citizens?

Question 3: What development or deployment of the technology mentioned in that paragraph of that resolution has been undertaken, or is presently being undertaken, in the Netherlands, by the dutch, or affecting dutch citizens?

Question 4: How many dutch citizens have been affected by non-consensual testing, experiments or operations deploying the sort of technology mentioned in that paragraph of that European Parliament resolution?

Question 5: To how many of those enumerated in answer to question 5 above has it been admitted openly that they have thus been affected?

Question 6: How many of those enumerated in answer to questions 4 and 5 respectively have received compensation in respect of those affects?

Question 7: What legal authority does the government claim for any non-consensual testing, experiments or operations deploying the relevant technology? (E.g. Is it statute law, or the Royal Prerogative?)

Question 8: How is the use of the Official Secrets Act as the principal grounds for denying victims information they need in order to take legal action in defence of their human rights purported not to be a breach of the treaty obligations of the Netherlands/UN, by virtue of Article 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights?

I look forward to receiving your government's frank answers to these rather important questions.


Respectfully


LFarhouni


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment