Please note this article was first published in 2004.
Keep in mind when reading this, that the man being interviewed is no two-bit internet conspiracy buff.
- Stanley Hilton was a senior advisor to Sen
Bob Dole (R) and has personally known Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz for
decades. This courageous man has risked his professional reputation,
and possibly his life, to get this information out to people.
- The following is from his latest visit to Alex Jones' radio show.
- Note: All honor to Stanley Hilton for risking his life so that we may know the truth of 9/11.
- The Bush Junta Unmasked
- "This (9/11) was all planned. This
was a government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the order.
He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass
murder." --Stanley Hilton
- Alex Jones interview of Stanley Hilton, attorney for 911 taxpayers' lawsuit
- AJ: He is back with us. He is former Bob
Dole's chief of staff, very successful counselor, lawyer. He represents
hundreds of the victims families of 9/11. He is suing Bush for
involvement in 9/11. Now a major Zogby poll out - half of New Yorkers
think the government was involved in 9/11. And joining us for the next
35 minutes, into the next hour, is Stanley Hilton. Stanley, it's great
to have you on with us.
- SH: Glad to be on.
- AJ: We'll have to recap this when we
start the next hour, but just in a nutshell, you have a lawsuit going,
you've deposed a lot of military officers. You know the truth of 9/11.
Just in a nutshell, what is your case alleging?
- SH: Our case is alleging that Bush and
his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth,
Tenet, were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing
9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush personally
ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well
as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in
order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda
on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East.
I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with
some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60s
with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these
people personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the
time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject - how to turn the
U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl
Harbor event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35
years.
- AJ: That's right. They were all
Straussian followers of a Nazi-like professor. And now they are setting
it up here in America. Stanley, I know you deposed a lot of people and
you've got your $7 million dollar lawsuit with hundreds of the victim's
families involved.
- SH: 7 billion, 7 billion
- AJ: Yeah, 7 billion. Can you go over some of the new and incriminating evidence you've got of them ordering the attack?
- SH: Yes, let me just say that this is a
taxpayers' class action lawsuit as well as a suit on behalf of the
families and the basic three arguments are they violated the
Constitution by ordering this event. And secondly that they [garbled]
fraudulent Federal Claims Act, Title 31 of the U.S. Code in which Bush
presented false and fraudulent evidence to Congress to get the Iraq war
authorization. And, of course, he related it to 9/11 and claimed that
Saddam was involved with that, and all these lies.
- AJ: Tell you what, stay there. Stanley, we've got to break. Let's come back and get into the evidence. BREAK
- AJ: All right my friends, second hour,
the anniversary of the globalist attack coming up. It's an amazing
individual we have on the line. Bob Dole's former chief of staff,
political scientist, a lawyer, he went to school with Rumsfeld and
others, he wrote his thesis about how to turn America into a
dictatorship using a fake Pearl Harbor attack. He's suing the U.S.
government for carrying out 9/11. He has hundreds of the victims'
families signing onto it - it's a $7 billion lawsuit. And he is Stanley
Hilton. I know that a lot of stations just joined us in Los Angeles and
Rhode Island and Missouri and Florida and all over. Please sir, recap
what you were just stating and then let's get into the new evidence.
And then we'll get into why you are being harassed by the FBI, as other
FBI people are being harassed who have been blowing the whistle on
this. So, this is really getting serious. Stanley, tell us all about
it.
- SH: Yeah, we are suing Bush, Condoleezza
Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Mueller, etc. for complicity in personally not
only allowing 9/11 to happen but in ordering it. The hijackers we
retained and we had a witness who is married to one of them. The
hijackers were U.S. undercover agents. They were double agents, paid by
the FBI and the CIA to spy on Arab groups in this country. They were
controlled. Their landlord was an FBI informant in San Diego and other
places. And this was a direct, covert operation ordered, personally
ordered by George W. Bush. Personally ordered. We have incriminating
evidence, documents as well as witnesses, to this effect. It's not just
incompetence - in spite of the fact that he is incompetent. The fact is
he personally ordered this, knew about it. He, at one point, there were
rehearsals of this. The reason why he appeared to be uninterested and
nonchalant on September 11th - when those videos showed that Andrew
Card whispered in his ear the [garbled] words about this he listened to
kids reading the pet goat story, is that he thought this was another
rehearsal. These people had dress-rehearsed this many times. He had
seen simulated videos of this. In fact, he even made a Freudian slip a
few months later at a California press conference when he said he had,
quote, "seen on television the first plane attack the first tower." And
that could not be possible because there was no video. What it was was
the simulated video that he had gone over. So this was a personally
government-ordered thing. We are suing them under the Constitution for
violating Americans' rights, as well as under the federal Fraudulent
Claims Act, for presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress to justify
the bogus Iraq boondoggle war, for political gains. And also, under the
RICO statute, under the Racketeering Corrupt Organization Act, for
being a corrupt entity. And I've been harassed personally by the chief
judge of the federal court who is instructing me personally to drop
this suit, threatened to kick me off the court, after 30 years on the
court. I've been harassed by the FBI. My staff has been harassed and
threatened. My office has been broken into and this is the kind of
government we are dealing with.
- AJ: Absolutely and now it has come out -
five separate drills of flying hijacked jets into buildings that
morning - which you told us about before it even broke in the
Associated Press. They were trying to get out ahead of you. You talked
about how you interviewed military people who were told it was a drill
that morning. Then to get out ahead of that, the news finally reported
on it. Now, we've learned that all these operations - I want to get
into that, I want to talk about the new incriminating evidence of
ordering it and how they had drilled on this, how Cheney was in the
bunker controlling this. That has even come out in the mainstream news
but they won't release the details of that, Stanley. But what type of
FBI harassment are you going through? SH: First of all, my office was
burglarized in San Francisco several months ago. Files were gone
through and some files were seized - particularly the ones dealing with
the lady that was married to one of the hijackers. Fortunately, I had
spare copies in a hidden place so nothing disappeared permanently. But
more significantly, FBI agents have been harassing one of my staff
members and threatening them with vague but frightening threats of
indicting them. And it's just total harassment. They have planted a
spy, an undercover agent, in my organization, as we just recently
discovered. In other words, these are Nazi Germany tactics. This is the
kind of government you have in this country. This is what Bush is all
about.
- AJ: Stay there, Stanley, Bob Dole's former chief of staff. We'll come back after this quick break. Please stay with us. BREAK
- AJ: All right, eight minutes, 25 seconds
into the second hour. Stanley Hilton, political scientist, lawyer, Bob
Dole's former chief of staff, is suing the government for 7 billion
dollars for carrying out 9/11 and for racketeering. And he joins us
now. During the break, I first really did the big interview with
Stanley Hilton after I saw him attacked on Fox News. And that interview
got massive attention. And then he kind of went underground for a while
because a judge, we're going to talk about that, ordered him to not do
any more interviews. And now he's back doing interviews. He's had his
office broken into, FBI threats and harassment. Bottom line, he has
deposed military individuals, wives of hijackers, you name it, it was a
government operation. It has even come out in mainstream news, a piece
here, a piece there. They had drills on 9/11, that's why NORAD stood
down. Cheney was in control of the whole thing. Stanley Hilton has now
gotten documents about how Bush ordered the whole operation. And I'll
tell you right now, his life is in danger, folks. And he's got so much
courage. He went to school with these neocons at the University of
Chicago. He wrote his thesis on how the government could use terrorist
attacks to set up martial law. He is the man for the time and folks
wondered why he disappeared for a while and just did his lawsuit and
wasn't doing interviews, it was because he was ordered to. Stanley, can
you get into that for us?
- SH: I did an interview with you, Alex,
about a year and a half ago, and literally two weeks after that, I was
contacted by the emissary of the chief judge of the federal court where
I have the lawsuit. And I was warned not to publicize it but to keep it
quiet and threatened with discipline. And it remained quiet until a
couple of months ago and then I got on the air on some programs and
some publicity and July 1st, I was threatened directly by the chief
judge here, threatened with court discipline. This particular judge has
been circulating communiqués to the other federal judges seeking
anything negative she can get against me to try and discipline me after
I've been on the court here for 30 years with no disciplinary problems
at all. This is suddenly happening. And her assistants who are on the
committee of the court met with me on July 1st in Palo Alto,
California, and threatened me directly. They handed me a copy of the
lawsuit and said that the judge wants me to dismiss this. What's this?
She doesn't like the content of it. This is politically incorrect. This
is outside the norm. I said I represented more than 400 plaintiffs, how
am I going to dismiss this case? And they threatened me directly and
they said, "the next time you'll be disciplined." And also they've
threatened me not to go public, etc. And this is just outrageous.
- AJ: It's all color of law. No direct orders, just all in your face.
- SH: They sent a letter out, and of course
they deny it's because of the political content of the suit but they
told me directly on the phone that it is because of this suit and this
judge is very, very angry, apparently has been in contact with
Ashcroft's Justice Department. I got a call from Ashcroft's Justice
Department a few months ago about this, demanding that I drop the suit,
threatening sanctions and all kinds of things. I refused to drop it.
AJ: Now let's go back over, you had them break into your office,
harassment. Let's go over that in detail.
- SH: My office was broken into about 6
months ago. The file cabinets - it was obvious they had been rifled
through. Files were stolen. Files dealing with this particular case and
particularly with the documents I had regarding the fact that the -
some of these hijackers, at least some of them were on the payroll of
the U.S. government as undercover FBI, CIA, double agents. They are
spying on Arab groups in the U.S. And, in effect, all this led up to
the effect that al Qaeda is a creation of the George Bush
administration, basically. That the entity that he called al Qaeda is
directly linked to George Bush. And all this stuff was stolen.
Fortunately, I had copies. But this was just part of the harassment.
The FBI has also been harassing some of my assistants and has planted a
spy in our midst. And it is just outrageous that these Nazi tactics are
being used - and the obstruction of justice, these people are
criminals. And that's what's happening under the tremendous pressure
here to just drop it. Or to shut up now and just go away.
- AJ: Now, let's talk about what they want
you to drop. Let's talk about, without giving names, the people you
deposed, what really happened, the picture you've got. You said earlier
that Bush ordered this, they were simulating this which they now admit
there were simulations on that morning. Let's go over what they don't
want you to talk about, Stanley.
- SH: We have evidence both documentary as
well as witness sworn statements from undercover former FBI agents, FBI
informants, etc., that other officials in the Pentagon and the military
and the Air Force that deal with the fact that there were many drills,
many rehearsals for 9/11 before it happened. Bush had seen this
simulated on TV many times. He blurted this out at a press conference
in California a few months after 9/11 where he said he had, quote, seen
the first plane hit the first building on the video. And that's not
possible because there was no official video of that. There was one of
the second plane not the first one. He had seen the first one. We do
have some incriminating documents that Bush personally ordered 9/11
events. It was well planned. A FEMA official has admitted on tape that
he was there the night before - September 10th, that is
- AJ: And now Mayor Giuliani, a few months
ago in the 911 Commission, admitted that - Tripod II. They had their
whole command post already moved out of Building 7. Now, this is very,
very important. This is a key area of this whole event. You said months
before it came out on the CIA's own website and the Associated Press,
you said I deposed people. They said there were drills that morning and
exactly what happened, happening - that was the smoke-screen for the
stand-down. And then to get out ahead of it, the CIA comes out and said
yeah we were running a drill that morning. Now, we've learned that
five, possibly six, were confirmed. Five of these - one drill with the
exact same thing happening that actually happened, at the exact same
time in the morning. That's why NORAD stood down with 24 different
blips on the screen. You've said this. You brought this up first. Now,
I know you can't get too much into detail but can you tell us how you
learned of this?
- SH: I have interviewed individuals in
NORAD and the Air Force. I personally toured NORAD many years ago
around the time that I worked for Dole. I'm very familiar with the
operations at Cheyenne Mountain at Colorado Springs, where NORAD is.
Individuals that work in NORAD as well as the Air Force have stated
this, off the record, but the point is, yes, this was not just five
drills but at least 35 drills over at least two months before September
11th. Everything was planned, the exact location
- AJ: But five drills that day.
- SH: That day, that day, and Bush thought it was a drill. That's the only explanation for why he appeared nonchalant
- AJ: We also had NORAD officers and civilian air traffic controllers going, "Is this part of the exercise? Is this a drill?"
- SH: Yes.
- AJ: On the tapes and in TV interviews, they thought it was, quote, a drill.
- SH: That's right. That's exactly what I
said long before it became public. I've known about this since earlier
in March of '03, as I stated before. This was all planned. This was a
government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the order. He
personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass
murder. And now, obstruction of justice by attempting to use a federal
judge and FBI agents to inhibit a legitimate civil lawsuit in this
country, in federal court. Even a chief judge in this court tried to
harass and threaten me personally for representing legitimate
plaintiffs. And they got Clinton for allegedly lying under oath about
Paula Jones and now - look what's happening now. And Ken Starr used to
be across from me in Duke Law School in the early `70s and it´s
interesting that he got away with trying to get Clinton impeached, so
we have a far worse criminal sitting in the oval office today -
somebody guilty of mass murder as well as obstruction of justice.
- AJ: Well, I mean look, they say they
never heard of a plan to fly planes into buildings - said it all over
television - Rice, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft. And then we find
out they were running all these drills that morning. Even if they
weren't involved, that proves they were liars about ever hearing of
such a plan.
- SH: Well, I'm trying to take their
depositions - I've been trying to take their depositions for months.
They've been trying to object to it. They will have to admit they were
either lying then or now. It's clearly perjury either way. They are
liars and perjurers; that's what they are. These are the people that we
have running this government and, of course, they knew about it. How
are they going to claim now that they didn't know about these drills?
Their idea is that nobody knew anything. It's the old know-nothing
mentality. And how anybody considers this believable is beyond me.
- AJ: All right, now people ask how could a
huge organization, how could the AWACs, how could the military let this
happen; whereas before, if your Cessna got off course for five minutes,
they would launch F-16s on you. It's real simple. It's what Stanley
Hilton said here a year and a half ago. It's what came out in the news
after that. The military, good people, were told this was all a drill.
And it was not a drill. And ABC News admits that Cheney was in control
of [?] out of the White House [?] and that he ordered the military to
quote "do something." Our inside sources from Hilton and others say it
was a stand down and they admit they will not release that under
national security. Stanley?
- SH: Well they are going to admit it,
they're going to release it in the court case because if you demand it
under subpoena powers and they must release it. And part of our lawsuit
is brought in the name of the U.S. because under the federal fraudulent
[Claims Act], we accuse the Bush Administration of presenting a
fraudulent claim to Congress. And under the statutes of Title 31 of the
U.S. code, they must release this information. That's why they are
trying to threaten me, harass me, invade my office, steal my files,
commit blatant obstruction of justice and other crimes to try and
prevent a legitimate civil suit from exposing these criminals and their
acts of treason and mass murder.
- AJ: I think you need to publicly tell folks that you are not planning suicide. Would you like to tell folks that?
- SH: (laughs) I'm not planning suicide.
I've got family and I'm not planning that but I don't like the threats
I'm under - but I can tell you this, it's taking a toll emotionally on
me and my staff. And particularly, when you get a threat from the chief
judge of your own court.
- AJ: Why have you decided to go public
again after a year of being under the radar? SH: Because the more and
more evidence that I've been adducing over a year and a half has made
it so obvious to me that this was now without any doubt a government
operation and that it amounts to the biggest act of treason and mass
murder in American history. I mean George Bush makes Benedict Arnold
look like a patriot. He makes Benedict Arnold look like George
Washington. I mean that's what we have - a criminal and a traitor
sitting in the White House pretending he's a patriot, wrapping himself
in the flag. And it's pretty disgusting because the other side of the
so-called opposition, the Kerry camp is just saying nothing because
they're afraid to speak.
- AJ: Stay right there. We'll be right back.
- BREAK
- AJ: Stanley Hilton will be with us for
another 15 or 16 minutes. Then he's got to go into court. Bob Dole's
former chief of staff, political scientist, lawyer, represents 400 plus
plaintiffs - most of them victims of 9/11. When I was in New York last
week, everybody I was talking to, I mean 90 plus percent of them at
ground zero - "I had family, I worked in the buildings, my son's a Navy
Seal - he called the night before and said don't go to work." You know,
all of this, and then now they never had any idea - and it turns out
they had all these drills - and one drill of hijacked jets flying into
the World Trade Center and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning. That
morning - come on people! And Stanley Hilton brought all this out on
this show before it was in the mainstream news. And I was talking to
him during the break. I mean, the harassment, the moles, the
threatening of his staff, the judge threatening him. Stanley, let's get
specifically into the documents that you have now got that they have
now been robbing you for, that you luckily, thank God had copies.
Specifically, Bush ordering this. Can you get into that for us -
ordering 9/11? SH: National Security Council classified documents which
[garbled] and it's was part of a series of documents that were involved
with the drill documents. This was all planned - they had it on
videotape. These planes were controlled by remote control, as I stated
previously a year and a half ago, there's a system called Cyclops.
There is a computer chip in the nose of the plane and it enables the
ground control, the military ground control, to disable the pilot's
control of the plane and to control it and to fly it directly into
those towers. That's what happened. It's also a technology used on
what's called the Global Hawk, which is an aircraft drone - a remote-
controlled aircraft. And they were doing it. We are talking about
National Security Council classified documents that clearly indicated
that [garbled] had a green light to order this to go and this is no
drill. These drills that were running were clearly a dress rehearsal
and this was a government operation. You wonder why these people are
trying to threaten people and trying to intimidate people who have
written this suit, I guess if you murdered 3000 of your own citizens,
in conjunction with the corrupt Royal family of Saudi Arabia as Bush
did. And if you then waste billions more on a worthless garbage war in
Iraq, I guess you've got something to worry about and you want to
threaten people to prevent it from coming out.
- AJ: I mean let's look at this. Not only
are there dress rehearsals, they are smoke screens so the good military
stands down and doesn't know what's happening. But it's now coming out,
even in mainstream news, that yes these drills were going on. Yes, and
some of these drills, quote, passenger-type jets were under remote
control - this is decades old technology. In 1958, NORAD was [ ] old
jets and using them for target practice. Decades ago they flew jumbo
jets from LA to Sidney Australia. So since that's going on, everybody
knows that. And it's the same MO. Just like the first World Trade
Center [bombing] where they get two retarded men who followed this
blind sheik who had a tiny mosque above a pizza parlor. And they set
them up as the patsies. Then the FBI cooks the bomb, trains the
drivers. This informant goes, "You're not going to bomb the building?
They go "Yeah, we're letting it go forward." He tapes them to protect
themselves. The two retarded gentlemen, thank God, didn't park it up
against the column, as the FBI instructed them to do, so it didn't
bring down the tower - because you have to be right up against the
column. That doesn't happen. Yet, it's the same thing with 9/11. You've
got these CIA agents, these Arabs, who were trained at U.S. military
bases, Pensacola Naval Air Station - mainstream media, out creating
their legends for this background. They're on board the aircraft. My
military sources say nerve gas kills everybody on board the plane -
nerve gas packets. Then they fly the planes into buildings. From your
inside sources, is that accurate?
- SH: It's one of the things that we are
looking into - that nerve gas or something else disabled people. It's
possible. I can't say for sure to be honest with you
- AJ: All you know is they were government agents and they were on board and the planes were remote controlled.
- SH: Yeah, it was basically a smokescreen.
I mean, the events of the hijackings, how someone snuck in those
cutters, it was a plant. It was like a classic decoy. I've got some
military background. And it's called decoy. It's a decoy operation. You
make the people focus on the decoy to avoid looking at the real
criminals. So they are focusing on these so-called nineteen hijackers
and saying, "Oh, it must have been these Arabs. When, in fact, the
guilty person is at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue - sitting in the oval
office. That's the guilty person. That's the one who authorized it.
There is only one man who could have authorized this operation and
that's Bush. And anyone at NORAD will tell you as I have been told
personally at NORAD in the war control room, there is only one man who
has the power to do this kind of thing and that's Bush. Even though
many believe he's a puppet. And I think in many ways he is. The fact of
the matter is where was [ ] Cheney, Rumsfeld and these other traitors.
The fact is Bush personally ordered and he's guilty and liable and he's
going to be re-elected apparently because the media's asleep and
[garbled] for Bush. AJ: Well, the media is owned by the same military
industrial complex that carried out the attacks.
- SH: Yeah, the media is only interested in
maintaining the official government fantasy that this was a little lone
Arab. These Arabs couldn't even steer that plane down a runway.
- AJ: Stay there Stanley, final segment coming up. BREAK
- AJ: Mr. Hilton, when you talk to these
FBI agents, when you talk to these military men and women, what's their
attitude? They've got to be pretty freaked out to have the big picture
and know what actually happened on 9/11.
- SH: Yes, you know it's like clouds just
before a thunderstorm in the sense that they are sort of pregnant with
rage. They are just enraged at the criminal politicians who have
perverted and misused the government to murder its own citizens and
pursue these dubious political ends. And many of them, in increasing
numbers, are willing to talk and will talk under subpoena - but only
under subpoena because the official party line of the government is
shut up and don't talk to the trial lawyer. But more and more, they are
very outraged that part of the government has done this to its own
people, to its own people. I mean you have to go back to Stalin to see
something - not even Hitler did this to his own people. You have to
look at Stalin who murdered the Kulaks, the Russians for his own
dubious gains. Also we've got - we have a Stalinist mentality in this
country. And, if these people pose as patriots and wrap themselves in
the flag, it's disgusting. I wanted also to point out that the Japanese
television network, Asahi, is going to be airing a special on primetime
tomorrow, on September 11th. They interviewed me for eight hours a
couple of weeks ago. I'll be on that. I wish - of course, the America
media don't care so they are not going to care. But in Japan, people
are very serious in interviewing me and others. And we have a website
now, called deprogram.info, if more people are interested:
www.deprogram.info. But the other thing, I just wanted to say that if
anything happens to me - and I don't know why - because I'm being
threatened here now. And it seems you can't bring a case in this
country anymore against criminals in power without being threatened.
And this is how they operate. The stakes are pretty high when you've
got a world historical level of treason and fraud by this government
against it's own people. I guess this is what you have to expect.
- AJ: Stanley, the globalists, the new
world order crowd, definitely intend to carry out more terror attacks.
I know they would have carried out more attacks if we wouldn't have
done what we've been up to, if you wouldn't have been out there boldly
speaking out and many others. And then their electronic Berlin wall has
a bunch of cracks in it now. Thanks to good people like yourself and
many others who are speaking out and telling the truth. But do you
think that they may carry out what they've been hyping - a suitcase
nuke attack, a biological release to try to smokescreen all of this? I
know it's a catch 22, you've got to expose the murderers. We've got to
get the word out on this but some government people that I've talk to
say, "Yeah, but if you do that, they are going to go even more hard
core and must totally try to take over." But I say regardless, they are
already doing that. So what do you say to that?
- SH: Well, yeah, I think they have an
agenda. They have contingency plans. I think they are laying low now
because there are an increasing number of people, like myself, who are
openly challenging them and accusing them of criminal conduct. I think
they would have done it again if we had not spoken up. I think they're
planning, what they would like to do is silence any dissenters. That's
why we are trying to get the Patriot Act declared unconstitutional in
this lawsuit also.
- AJ: Let's talk about polls. In the
beginning a patriot is a scarce man, hated and feared, but in time when
his cause succeeds, the timid join him, because then it costs nothing
to be a patriot. You are one of those guys who hit the barbwire for us,
or figuratively jumped on the hand grenade for America. But when you've
got a Zogby poll, who is highly respected, half of New Yorkers believe
that the government was involved. When you have a Canadian poll, 63% on
average believe that the U.S. government was involved. And some groups,
as high as 76% in polls believe the government was involved. European
polls, two- thirds show the same thing. We have German defense
ministers and technology ministers and another member of their
government now, three of them going public, known conservatives, and
progressives. You have an environment minister, Michael Meacher, saying
that if they didn't do it, they sure as hell knew what was going on.
Look, if anybody who is a thinking person looks at the evidence, their
official story is impossible. Then you investigate and they are
involved in it. Comments to this massive awakening and what's
happening.
- SH: Well, I think that's why they want
the Patriot Act to suppress political dissent. They have to, they're
anticipating, they are not dumb individuals. I know these people
personally, Wolfowitz. These are criminal individuals but they are
smart and so they anticipated political dissent. And that's why, like
the Nazis, their forebears, and their blood brothers, the Nazis and the
Stalinists, they're all for political repression. Every corrupt and
criminal government has done this - they suppress their own people:
Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, Mao Tse-Tung, that's why we have the
Patriot Act. So it's hand in hand. They had it planned to go right up
to September 11th, this was all part of the plan. You have to do it. It
was part of my senior thesis. You must follow through the terrorists
attacks with a political suppression mechanism in the law. And that's
why they want Patriot I and Patriot II and their plans are to continue
launching more terrorist attacks to justify even more repression. The
goal is to make this a one party dictatorship in this country, to
pursue their dubious ends with their blood brothers like the Saudi
Royal family. And also, historical blood brothers, such as the Nazi
Germany and the Communist Russian. That's the goal
- AJ: You've got to go in just a minute or
two. But I wanted to also tell you about New York. Sound cannons that
are used in Iraq, they're against us. Men in black ski masks. 41,000
police, accredited media being arrested randomly. Children being
arrested, people in wheelchairs, 2000 plus people put in a camp with
barbwire fences inside with no bathrooms. You had to have permission to
go to the porta-potties. Police screaming at you. It had nothing to do
with terrorism. They are openly setting the precedent for martial law.
- SH: Well, that's right, the word
terrorist is now being overly broad and overly defined [garbled] and
also, you know, it's like the word communist was used for anything
during the McCarthy witch hunt. And anybody can be called a terrorist
by Bush's definition. But the irony is that the number one terrorist in
the world is living at the White House at the oval office today. That's
the real irony. For sheer hypocrisy, I think he deserves the world
prize and ought to be in the Ripley book, Believe It or Not, and the
Guinness book of world records for sheer brazen chicanery and fraud.
- AJ: Let me ask you a question on this
because this is the experience that I had. Watching television,
watching the killers, watching those that are guilty, stand up there as
our saviors is incredibly painful. It's like watching Ted Bundy being
the judge at his own trial. I mean it is just painful to know who these
people are. To see them putting America in a shredder. Now we are going
to have forced psychological testing of every American, forced
drugging, you know Pan-American unions, I mean it's just all happening,
it's in our face, Stanley.
- SH: Yeah, it's very disturbing and as one
who has studied the theory and concept of dictatorships, I personally
interviewed Albert Speer, who was Hitler's armaments minister. I
interviewed him in 1981 in Munich. And I've studied the psychology and
history of totalitarianism and there is no question that it's very
frightening. And it has, today, with high technology, albeit for the
first time in history, the chance of having a world empire dominated by
corrupt, technologically oriented government - an elite government. And
they've got now what people like Napoleon and Hitler didn't have, which
is the technological means to dominate not only their own country but
others - the world.
- AJ: The answer is to expose them as the
terrorists, to show how PNAC [Project for the New American Century]
said we need helpful Pearl Harbor events, to show how Northwoods called
for the exact 9/11-style attacks, to show their own plans. And to force
people to face this horror. What are they going to do in a year or two
when 80% of us, not half of us, know the truth?
- SH: Well, that's why they want repression
and, then again, the ancient old diversion, launch another terrorist
attack to get people to pitch it away. I mean who knows what they'll do
next. I mean their capacity for ingenious creation of these events is
sort of unraveled. I mean there is no limit. My guess is they are going
to try another stunt - maybe a stunt just before the election to
justify getting Bush reelected. Although it seems like he is running
against a straw man or a ghost right now, anyway. But, my guess is
they'll try some other tactic to get people's attention away from 9/11
if it gets to be too much attention. What you really want is for the
public to just lose interest because the public - and it's like
remember the Alamo, you know, people don't forget things like that. To
me it's like the Alamo, remember 9/11, that ought to be the slogan for
this outrageous act of treason. That's what it is. It's not
- AJ: We are at a crossroads, I don't think they anticipated this much resistance, Stanley.
- SH: Yeah, I hope they are truly wrong and
as incompetent as they are corrupt and guilty. That means their
incompetence is exceeded only by their corruption and their guilt. And
eventually, if enough people are going to get outraged enough, these
people in the bureaucracy and in the civil service and our military,
and eventually we can get people under subpoena these individuals will
be exposed.
- AJ: Stanley, their whole operation hinges
on us being naïve and not recognizing evil. This is what they got with
Hitler and others. People couldn't recognize evil so they continued to
repeat succumbing to it. We are recognizing it this time. We are
putting our lives, our treasure, our future on the line for freedom
because we cannot let these blood-thirsty control freak terrorists
capture us and use us and turn us into the empire and have a draft and
use us as their slaves to invade the planet. And that's their PNAC
plan. Stanley Hilton, I know you've got to get to court. God bless you.
I want to thank you for being here with us today. Can we get you back
on next week?
- SH: Sure, just give me a call.
- AJ: God bless you my friend. Any closing comments?
- SH: My closing comments would be, I think
people ought to just think about the consequence of having someone like
Bush in the White House and the danger for the future that these sorts
of individuals pose. This is not just a historical event of the past.
This is part of the plan and the camera is still rolling. They have an
agenda. These individuals are extremely dangerous. They are armed and
dangerous. They pose a clear and dangerous threat to every
freedom-loving person not only American but in the whole world.
- AJ: You are absolutely right Stanley
Hilton. They have captured the government. They have not captured the
peoples' minds and they are counting on us not facing up to it.
- SH: And they are counting on the
repressive Patriot Act and threats and chief judges and FBI agents
threatening people who are exposing them. That's what they are counting
on.
- AJ: But you're not backing down are you, my friend.
- SH: No, I'm not
- AJ: Well, we all stand with you, my brother, and God bless you.
- SH: All right. Thank you.
|
For now, think about this: the people dying of radiation-induced cancers ...
http://www.911researchers.com/node/917
Posted by: David Howard | September 10, 2008 at 03:51 PM