AddThis Social Bookmark Button

BREAKING 9/11 NEWS!

Financial Transformation

A POSITIVE FUTURE

Blog powered by TypePad
Bookmark and Share

« COOPRADIO.ORG: Dr. Judy Wood & Canadian Inventor/Scientist John Hutchison on 9/11 & The Hutchison Effect | Main | PETITION FOR CANADIAN 9/11 INVESTIGATION TO BE READ INTO CANADIAN PARLIAMENT TUESDAY JUNE 10th, 2008 »

Comments

John McCarthy

Steven Jones argues that the small amount of Tritium found in the WTC rubble is not sufficient evidence that a mini nuke was used in demolishing the WTC. He fails to address that deuterium was also found with the Tritium. Small amounts, yes, but combined they are the fingerprint of a pure hydrogen explosion. There is no other source for this combination of heavy elements of hydrogen.

Quantum Mechanics makes it possible to create a pure miniature hydrogen bomb, which leaves no radiation, that would fit inside of a matchbox. Of course, the yield of the weapon would depend on the configuration and amount of Deuterium and Tritium found as the fingerprint of the device used.

Jones does not mention the presence of deuterium with the tritium as irrefutable evidence of the use of a pure hydrogen device.

This does not mean that other types of explosives, (plastic, chemical, RDX, Directed Energy Weapons Systems) WERE NOT used to deceive anyone who might have access to the Crime Scene. The presence of Thermite and Thermate residue is not the primary source of the explosive event witnessed on 911.

The results of cuts to columns at 45 degree angles is a fingerprint of "Ribbon Charges" using plastic explosive, C4. Simply matching the thickness of the column with plastic explosives were ensure the desired cut which would ensure the removal of support for the upper floors.

A Directed Energy Weapon using the Monroe Principal (explosives seek the path of MOST resistance) leaves the great possibility of a conventional "shaped charge" configuration being employed in a nuclear "aimed" detonation where the explosive force could be triggered from the top down or bottom up or a combination of both.

The Richter Scale readings during the initial collapse sequence clearly show the reaction to ground waves as a result of the initiating event.

Pan caking floors, plastic explosives, RDX or Thermite detonations WOULD NOT register in the amounts recorded on 911.

An explosive force sufficient to obliterate the 47 four inch thick box columns of the WTC which rose from the basement to the top of each tower AND pulverized the concrete casings around them, and, at the same time, hurl 105 ton configurations of the outer steel walls in an arc over 300 feet and impale them in buildings across the street from the WTC would require a nuclear force whose energy was the primary device in the center of each WTC building that exploded the outer steel walls of the WTC.

The inescapable fact the Deuterium and Tritium were found IN ANY AMOUNTS proves that a pure hydrogen nuclear device was the primary source for the destruction of the WTC.

There is no other viable, plausible reason for the presence of these heavy metals of hydrogen in the basements of the WTC.

This conclusion brings us to the question of who had the motivation, opportunity and means to employ such a sophisticate device.

The answer is inescapable.

roif mqaicyz

lsugo gqlaekpuf fqxk jtaebzvh zxvfhrmwa vljzenyri vefjxcmw

not a fucking retard

are you mentally fucking retarded? just wondering

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment