MEDIA ADVISORY: Independent Scientist Leuren Moret and International Lawyer Alfred Webre call for International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

VANCOUVER, B.C. - In order to prosecute the 9/11 perpetrators under the 9/11 Independent Prosecutors Act,  Independent Scientist/DU Radiation Expert Leuren Moret and International Lawyer Alfred Webre will call for the establishment of an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, in a public announcement to be made at the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference on Sunday June 24, 2007.

According to Moret and Webre, 9/11 was a False Flag Operation by an international War Crimes Racketeering Organization, to provide a pretext to engage in Genocidal & Ecocidal Depleted Uranium (DU) bombing of Central Asia (Afghanistan and Iraq) in order to secure vast oil and uranium reserves; to roll out a Terror-based National Security state-system world-wide; and to implement the final stages of a world Depopulation policy. 

The purpose of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal is to criminalize war, and to enforce the prohibitions of Aggressive war and War Crimes, which since 1945 have been prohibited by the Nuremberg Principles, through a permanent citizen’s war crimes tribunal and through the principles of Natural law, restorative justice, and International law.

Alfred Lambremont Webre JD, MEd, an international lawyer and Member of the Pro Tem Committee for the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal to be held in 2008, will make the announcement in an address to the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference, on the issue of "The International 9/11 Citizen's War Crimes Tribunal: The 9/11 False Flag Operation as a War Crime under International Law."


DATE/TIME OF 9/11 WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL ANNOUNCEMENT:

Sunday, June 24, 2007 at 6PM PDT @ Main Stage
The Maritime Labour Centre
1880 Triumph St., Vancouver, B.C. V5L 1K3
CANADA

The purpose of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is to prosecute the perpetrators of the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001, under the prima facie evidence assembled for the 9/11 Independent Prosecutors Act for War Crimes, including Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and Crimes Against Peace (now Aggressive War), as set out in the Nuremberg Principles, the Geneva Conventions, and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

The 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act appoints an Independent Prosecutor under the authority of Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute Treason against the United States of America by U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and other John and Jane Does for planning and carrying out the acts of treason, as defined in Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out, and/or causing to be carried out an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001, as part of a False Flag Operation. Article III of the U.S. Constitution provides that, "Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort...."

The main grounds for concluding that there is prima facie evidence that the named individuals - U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld - abused the power of their office and committed Article III Treason on September 11, 2001 are contained in a Legislative Memorandum to the U.S. Congress accompanying the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act.  This Legislative Memorandum was co-authored by expert researcher David Ray Griffin, independent scientist Leuren Moret and attorney Alfred Webre.

The facts recited in the Congressional Memorandum constitute prima facie evidence that the named individuals---U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld---and other John and Jane Does are independently and jointly guilty of Treason against these United States under Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution.   For the full Congressional Memorandum, go to:

Congressional Memorandum: Summary of Prima Facie Evidence of Treason
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/04/memorandum_summ.html

A Summary of the threshold of prima facie evidence is as follows.

I. The attacks of 9/11, as portrayed in the official account, could not have succeeded if standard operating procedures between the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and NORAD had been followed. The Pentagon, under the leadership of Donald Rumsfeld, has provided three mutually inconsistent accounts of NORAD’s response, which means that at least two of them are false. Moreover, the third account, articulated by the 9/11 Commission, is contradicted by a wide range of facts, including evidence that the FAA had notified NORAD in a timely fashion. There must have been stand-down orders, and these could have come only from the highest levels of the Pentagon and the White House.

II. Overwhelming evidence exists that the collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 were instances of controlled demolition, and/or of the application of exotic weapons such as land-based, air-based or possible space-based Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). But al-Qaeda operatives could not have obtained the needed access to the buildings to plant the explosives and would not have ensured that the buildings come straight down. Nor could al-Qaeda operatives have obtained command and control of advanced Directed Energy Weapons, Microfusion devices (4th generation mini-nuclear weapons), bunker-busters, or other exotic weapons alternatives that are known to be in the deployment or testing phase in the US Defense arsenal. The controlled demolition and/or Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) or exotic weapons application, therefore, had to be the work of U.S. Government and other insiders.  That President Bush was one of those insiders is suggested by the fact that his brother and cousin were principals in the company in charge of WTC security. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by the removal of evidence (the collapsed steel), which at a crime scene is normally a federal offense. Finally, if the airplane strikes could have occurred only with the consent of the President and the Secretary of Defense (as suggested in the previous point), the coordination of these strikes with the demolition of the buildings - and/or with the use of exotic weapons such as Directed Energy Weapons -  implies their involvement in the latter as well.   

The design of the International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is to provide a judicial, impartial forum for the evaluation of forensic evidence.

At present, there are several alternative, though not mutually exclusive models of how the WTC Towers fell, in a controlled demolition. While there is compelling evidence for one model over another at this time, the purpose of an impartial forum is to allow evidence to be presented. This includes evidence of traditional chemical means of controlled demolition, as well as more exotic means, as warranted by the forensic evidence. The models of controlled demolition to be explored, thus would include at least: traditional thermite and thermate exposives; Microfusion devices (4th generation nuclear weapons); and Directed Energy Weapons (DEW), be they land-based, air-based, or space-based. Correspondence with the USAF Kirtland Base Directed Energy Directorate does not rule out the existence of Directed Energy Weapons in these configurations.

III. Overwhelming evidence also exists for the conclusion that the attack on the Pentagon was an inside job. That the official story could not be true is evident from many facts: Alleged hijacker Hani Hanjour’s incompetence; the choice of the Pentagon west wing as the target; the impossibility of a commercial airliner’s coming back to Washington undetected and hitting the Pentagon unless permitted; and the lack of physical evidence consistent with an attack by a Boeing 757. That the strike was an inside job is implied by the falsity of the official story, the evidence that the strike was made by a military aircraft, the removal of evidence, and the government’s refusal to release videos of the strike. This operation could hardly have been planned without the involvement of Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld.

9/11 & DU at the Pentagon

In April, 2007, Leuren Moret exposed the U.S. military’s illegal use of Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons in target practice in Hawaii, in violation of U.S. military environmental regulations.  The elevated radiation readings she recorded were carried by ABC-TV news in Hawaii on April 29 & 30, 2007.

Leuren Moret reported similar elevated radiation readings downwind from the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001.  Two days after 9/11, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) confirmed that the Pentagon crash site rubble was radioactive and that the probable contaminant was Depleted Uranium (DU). The entry and exit holes through the Pentagon crash site were the signature of a kinetic energy penetrator, such as a Cruise missile, and the term “punch-out hole” was written by crash site investigators over the exit hole.  This is a military term used for kinetic energy penetrators.   Major Doug Rokke, former Director of the Gulf War I DU Cleanup Team, reported that an email from the Pentagon 30 minutes after impact confirmed a Cruise missile hit the Pentagon on 9/11.  Recently vast Uranium deposits have been reported in Khazakhstan and Afghanistan. Khazakhstan is expected to out-produce Canada (now the world's top producer) in Uranium production within 12 years. This exposes the economic interests behind the events of 9/11, specifically the unjustified military attack by the U.S. on Afghanistan using 9/11 as a pretext.

IV. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by President Bush’s remaining at the Florida Elementary school after it was evident---given the truth of the official account---that the United States was experiencing a surprise attack. This behavior makes sense only if Bush and his lead Secret Service agent knew that there would be no attack on the school.

V. The complicity of Vice President Cheney in the attack on the Pentagon and the downing of Flight 93 is implied by the testimony of Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta in conjunction with the false claims of the 9/11 Commission, under the guidance of administration insider Philip Zelikow, as to when Cheney went to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) and when he issued the shoot-down authorization.

VI. The conclusion from the evidence that members of the Bush administration orchestrated the attacks of 9/11 is reinforced by the fact that they had some huge projects---prosecuting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and obtaining funding to accelerate the technological transformation of the military---that would likely be possible only in the event of “a new Pearl Harbor.”

The establishment of an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is justified, given that official institutions in the U.S. have failed to assign legal accountability for the False Flag Operation of 9/11.  Representative John Conyers, Jr., Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee and his senior staff personally reviewed the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act and Congressional Memorandum following the 2006 U.S. Mid-term Election and Senior Staff met twice with representatives of the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act.  The Chairman refused to introduce the Act, despite support for the Act by his Senior Staff.  The 9/11 Commission failed to take testimony under oath from Bush and Cheney, and reached fraudulent conclusions.

9/11 As A War Crime

The False Flag Operation of 9/11 was the pretext for, and an integral part of the planning and execution of the illegal War of Aggression in 2001 against Afghanistan and of War Crimes committed by the United States in Afghanistan, as found by the Final Judgment, International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan at Tokyo. The Court found the use of Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons in Afghanistan to constitute War Crimes, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and Omnicide.  The False Flag Operation of 9/11 is a legal component of these War Crimes, and the perpetrators of 9/11 are guilty Aggressive War, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and War Crimes.


MEDIA ADVISORY:
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/06/international_l.html

International 9/11 Citizen's War Crimes Tribunal
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/

References:

9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act - Executive Summary
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/06/executive_summa.html

Congressional Memorandum: Summary of Prima Facie Evidence of Treason
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/04/memorandum_summ.html

9/11 Disappearing Explosions - Brasscheck TV (Video)
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/110.html

Leuren Moret – Bio
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/nuclear_free_zone/2007/05/leuren_moret_bi.html

Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd - Bio
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Webre

KITV Hawaii - Depleted Uranium Hawaii (2 Mins 33 Seconds)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L94IUSw54pQ

Leuren Moret – Expert Testimony at the Tokyo International Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/nuclear_free_zone/2007/05/du_depleted_ura.html

DU: Dirty Bombs, Missiles, Bullets by Leuren Moret
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/DU/DU_DBDMDB.html

From Hiroshima to Iraq, 61 years of uranium wars,
A suicidal, genocidal, omnicidal course by Leuren Moret
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=5949

CONTACT:

Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Campaign for Cooperation in Space
Tel: 604-733-8134
Email: peace@peaceinspace.org      

International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/         

#  #  #  #  # 

URL of this article:

http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/06/international_l.html

Comments

[jacob G]

I think this is a good idea... If they arn't guilty, They will have nothing to hide, and will consent to this!

[Leslie Bell]

Good luck. Somehow I believe the real truth will come out regarding this, and that the real perpetrators will be caught, tried, convicted, and punished. This crime was simply too big, simply too over the top, simply too arrogant to NOT be exposed with the weapon of truth and the technology of the internet.

May the truth reign supreme and soon!

[Eyes Wide Open]

From the moment I watched those buildings fall live on TV on 9/11 I knew that it was not at all a normal result of the plane impacts. Following that day I have searched the www for others who may also have been "troubled" by what they witnessed. Over the years since there has been a virtual plethora of evidence from which only a moron or virtual vegetable would not conclude that the buildings were "pulled" (Larry Silverstein)or controlled demolitions and that the pentagon "attack" was not also a fabricated or "false flag" incident.

The involvement of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Perle, Feith, Silverstein, Mossad, CIA, FBI, and many others is so blatantly obvious as to be a no brainer.

When I read articles like this I smile, as I cannot help but feel that in some small way the criminals who perpertrated this act and the following crimes against the Iraqi and Afghani peoples not forgetting the London, Madrid & Bali flase flag ops may be feeling some of the fear that they have caused others, and I smile with ultimate hope that these filth will soon be either shot for treason or gaoled for 1000 lifetimes. :o)

[Leta Licata]

Let's just hope that a media block out of this event can be overcome.

I applaud all those involved for seeking the truth about 9/11.

[Patrick]

When the decision was made in 1946 to go ahead with a massive genocidal build up of nuclear weapons, the American experiment in force, fraud and genocide, ended.
Legally, treason would only exist if the state were in existence. The state of America ended when the decision was made in 1946 to destroy the people of the state of America, and the people of the world.
As it is ended, conspiracy to commit genocide would be an apt legal charge to bring against our nuclear war criminals.

Our former state has entered a period not unlike a company that has failed, and gone into temporary receivership.
The plan to exterminate the mass of the human race with the use of nuclear weapons has ended the legal basis of the state.
The still unknown group of Extraterrestrials, who have intervened and prevented our extermination, have repeatedly shut down our genocidal nuclear war machine many times over the decades.

We are the "Living Dead."

Rumsfeld, Cheney, Bush and other malefactors, are still trying to start a full blown nuclear war.
It is not necessary to have an Grand jury indictment in hand to make an arrest of a malefactor during the commission of a violent felony.
Our nuclear armed elite are committed to our extermination and are still committing violent felonies against the human race .
It appears that the "Gods" do not favor their plans to immolate us in an all out nuclear holocaust.
The nuclear "Trigger" has already been pulled on us. We exist only because of the intervention into our world by some still unknown high level power.
The Extraterrestrial visitors have demonstrated a much higher level of intelligence than our primitive nuclear war fighting elite.
Our nuclear war fighting simpletons are finished.

[Stan Kroll]

Teh crazy! It burns! May you suffer the punishment of the Scratches of the Thousand Lolcats!

[Jimmy J]

Umm does anyone know if this is a public event taking place at The Maritime Labour Centre in Vancouver and if so would I require a ticket to attend? Would there be a website with more information, I would love to see this!

[john mccarthy]

FW: drjudywood.com
From: john mccarthy (vpocv@hotmail.com)
Sent:Wed 6/20/07 3:17 AM
To: Jim Fetzer (jfetzer@d.umn.edu)

Cc: vpocv@hotmail.com (vpocv@hotmail.com)

Hello Jim,

Re your show tonight with Judy Wood; my attempt to open the attachment below was blocked using Windows XP with IE.

I downloaded Firefox Two and was then successful in opening the attachment.

Reasonable men and women would have to conclude that the material destruction of the WTC Complex and the collateral damage to vehicles must have a direct causal relationship between a nuclear/DEW device(s) and the observable damage. Core sampling and dust analysis should be able to confirm these observations.

I have destroyed steel targets utilizing 'ecomony of force' C4 and related explosives which have a 'burn rate' of approximately 25,000 fps. Never have I observed a resulting fire from this activity. Reinforced concrete pillars two feet in diameter for bridge support are easily destroyed with 2 one quarter pound each of C4 opposing charges (earmuff), dual primed and dual ignited, without fire. When the opposing forces meet, they repel each other and enhance the destruction of the target which would normally require far greater amounts of of conventionally applied explosives.

Explosives have the phenomena of seeking the path of MOST resistance. Using plastic explosive (the Monroe Principal) in field expedient devices (IED's) will penetrate seven inches of homogeneous steel, without fire.

These techniques were taught by US Special Forces to most Mid Eastern countries in the early 1960's. This faux pax has had unintended consequences (blowback) in the current war in Iraq but has little or nothing to do with the total destruction of the material in the WTC Complex. The jagged, uneven 'cuts' in the steel of the WTC rubble is unlike the results from the use of C4 related products which produce a clean, smooth cut with the application of specific configurations of the explosives.

I have not observed pulverization of concrete or steel from the use of plastic explosives. The relative 'burn rate' of plastic explosives provides a cutting and heaving effect only. I have physically examined the results of such explosions within minutes without injury.

Although 'cutter charges' may have enhanced the destruction of exterior supporting members of the WTC Complex, it can by no means be deemed responsible for the initiating forces which brought down these buildings while heaving 100 ton steel girders over an arced distance of more than 300 feet. The destruction of the core of the WTC builders One and Two as observed is not possible from non-nuclear demolitions. Science has concluded that such a non-nuclear force would be impossible to assemble with conventional explosives which would result in the pulverization of the concrete and steel AND the wide dispersmant of heavy steel tonnage.

The obvious nexus of US Government involvement in the destruction of the WTC is irrefutable. Attempts to dissuade the American Public of this observation is evident in the blockage of site's like Judy Wood's.

This False Flag operation has more holes in it than the attack on the USS Liberty in June, 1967. The obvious modus operandi of the Northwoods Plan of 1963 is the catalyst for the 911 scenario.

How stupid do they think we are?

Bests,
John

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: traude.valko@gmx.de
To: vpocv@hotmail.com; traude.valko@gmx.de
Subject: drjudywood.com
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:01:49 -0700

http://drjudywood.com/dirt4.html

[john mccarthy]

Part Two....

Although 'cutter charges' may have enhanced the destruction of exterior supporting members of the WTC Complex, it can by no means be deemed responsible for the initiating forces which brought down these buildings while heaving 100 ton steel girders over an arced distance of more than 300 feet. The destruction of the core of the WTC builders One and Two as observed is not possible from non-nuclear demolitions. Science has concluded that such a non-nuclear force would be impossible to assemble with conventional explosives which would result in the pulverization of the concrete and steel AND the wide dispersmant of heavy steel tonnage.

The obvious nexus of US Government involvement in the destruction of the WTC is irrefutable. Attempts to dissuade the American Public of this observation is evident in the blockage of site's like Judy Wood's.

This False Flag operation has more holes in it than the attack on the USS Liberty in June, 1967. The obvious modus operandi of the Northwoods Plan of 1963 is the catalyst for the 911 scenario.

How stupid do they think we are?

Bests,
John

[Rumple Stiltskin]

Don't forget to include everyone in the mainstream media as co-conspirators. Treason hath no accomplices, only principals.

[john thomas]

As a former Navy officer, and recent Sec State foreign service officer, I applaud and fully support your efforts toward truth. I have no doubt that what you are alleging will be found out to be true and our current cesspool of congressional and administration officials who know these truths and have done nothing will be imprisoned or executed for their evils.

[F. Scott Searl]

An International Tribunal Court will have no "teeth", and even after proving that what has transpired is perhaps the greatest crime
of the century, and after establishing guilt of named conspirators, accountability and punishment will not occur without turning the U.S. government "inside out, upside down and backwards". If any conspiratory collusion is verified, an avalanche of pardons will follow, just as in proven by recent past history. "American Justice" will prevail without a real governmental upheaval.

[Michael P]

There's only one important question concerning the attacks, did the US gov't allow/participate in 9/11?

The answer to that query would explain the illegal wire-taps, suspension of habeas corpus, banning of books like "America Deceived" from Amazon, detaining of dissenters in fences miles away from events, and multiple wars based on lies.

How can the gov't be innocent in 9/11 when we have caught it lying so many times (WACO, Ruby Ridge, no WMDs, USS Liberty, Operation Northwoods, Gulf of Tonkin, Pearl Harbor, ETC.)?

In law, if you determine a person lies ONCE during his testimony, it can be assumed that he lied in the remainder of his testimony. How come we do not hold the gov't to the same standard as it holds us to?

The gov't lied to us about Iraq and more Americans have died there than in 9/11. If the gov't lied about Iraq then why is everyone so reluctant to believe that the gov't lied about 9/11?

Final link (before Stark County District Library bends to pressure and drops the title):
http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/book_detail.asp?&isbn=0-595-38523-0

[Lydia]

This announcement is beautiful. The indictment will be too. Congratulations and heartfelt thanks to the skilled, liberty and justice-loving individuals who researched and wrote it and are propelling it forward. I feel hope stirring in my heart and in this trampled-upon country. May this and other large courageous acts lead to freedom and some measure of justice for the imprisoned, tortured, murdered, bombed, maimed, widowed and orphaned victims -- both here and abroad -- of the cabal which perpetrated the Crimes of 9/11 and the wars for oil, uranium and control of the world.

[Patriot Militia]

JEWS did 911 and all world wars.
www.Jew-Crime
Wake up! It is already too late. Jew WW III is almost here.

[Patriot Militia]

www.Jew-Crime.com
Jews did 911

[rhb]

All governments develop toward corruption of one sort or another, and the individuals in positions of power act with impunity.

[Eyes Wide Open]

Dear John!
You explosives analyses is good, you did however neglect to incorporate the use of Thermite/Thermate in the cutting of the 47 core columns above the basements. The "jagged edges" you speak of are clear evidence of the use of Thermite/Thermate as are the rivers of molten steel pouring out of the upper floors prior to the collapse.
It is common knowlege that pools of molten steel in the basements maintained temperatures of 3000 degrees for weeks following the incident.

I would suggest and support evidence that micro-nukes were also used on the core in basement and sub-basement levels as the explosion/s would be primarily contained. The levels of Tritium recorded in the WTC dust can only be explained if micro-nukes were used. The evergrowing list of cancers and radiation linked illnesses of rescue workers is also clear evidence of a low yield nuclear device being used in the basement levels to vaporise the core columns. Remember, in all controlled demolitions the base of the building is the main area of destruction followed by the core columns to create a true implosion, or walls falling inwards and down into the basement. WTC7 is the smoking gun of a textbook controlled demolition. The 911 whitewash commission would not address nor attempt to explain why that building fell......why? Why indeed, because anyone with 1/2 a brain could see it was a controlled implosion (go to prisonplanet.com and search "Danny Jowenko"), So, if WTC 7 was "pulled" as inadvertantly spilled on TV by Larry Silverstein who happens to be the leaseholder of WTC 1,2 & 7, then who wired it (which would take weeks) and if 7 was an inside job then WTC 1 & 2....????????????

[Daniel Towsey]

Here you'll find the link to the second part video of Q&A

[American]

MAY GOD BLESS TRUTH & JUSTICE AND ALL THOSE WHO SEEK IT

I ALMOST GAVE UP ON HUMANITY UNTIL I READ THIS

THANK YOU

[jewels]

Now come on, we already know how stupid people are believing the official story. We are brainwashed sheeple being herded up like a bunch of dumbasses thinking they care about us. Operation Northwoods baby come alive 21st century. William Rodriguez, John O'Neill, Donald Rumsfeld saying that shit about the plane being 'shot out of the sky' and then looking at the evidence. Maybe thinking about the buildings falling in record time or how about WTC 7. DAMN! How about Silverstein saying they made the decision to 'PULL'! And I could go on and on!! The Pentagon & the Independent Investigation scenerios! Max Cleland and the entire connecting of the dots. Blaming Bin Laden in record speed! Molten Steel at the bottom of all 3 buildings. Evidence people.
Bad news people, those thugs will never consent to a trial.

[Jewels]

Now come on, we already know how stupid people are believing the official story. We are brainwashed sheeple being herded up like a bunch of dumbasses thinking they care about us. Operation Northwoods baby come alive 21st century. William Rodriguez, John O'Neill, Donald Rumsfeld saying that shit about the plane being 'shot out of the sky' and then looking at the evidence. Maybe thinking about the buildings falling in record time or how about WTC 7. DAMN! And I could go on and on!! How about Silverstein saying that they decided to 'pull', therefore we know WTC 7 was imploded! And then how about the bombs in the basement and that guy who put his arms up to shield the fire, or how others were screaming about them having 'BOMBS EVERYWHERE'??? And now lets laugh at how pathetic the 9/11 Investigation went or how Bin Laden was declared the guilty party immediately! All of the business, personal and financial connections along with the training of the guilty parties during the 80s and with the US help, WITH THE SAME SUSPECTS!!!
Bad news folks, these people will never be prosecuted or participate in any type of trial. They are in power and we are screwed :(

[concernedcitizen]

This sounds great. I would caution, however, by saying be very, very careful. These guys could be in the final stages of a well-planned coup to replace our current Republic of the United States with a dictatorship. They've had lots of time to get their little ducks in a row, laws changed, executive orders signed to achieve these ends; e.g., the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act. Just follow the paper trail of the actions of these criminals over the past 6-1/2 years. These guys could very well be the 21st Century versions of Stalin and Hitler. So, what I'm saying, is there may be some very dangerous people who may not want to have the 9/11 investigation brought under scrutiny.

[concernedcitizen]

Jewels- And now lets laugh at how pathetic the 9/11 Investigation went or how Bin Laden was declared the guilty party immediately!

_____________

Yeah, I read an article back then that stated that on the first taped message from Osama Bin Laden immediately after 9/11, he denied responsibility for the attacks. After that, he took the blame, but I always thought it strange that he didn't immediately take the credit for planning and executing this attack. I wonder if he's even alive. I mean, with the exception of very poor quality taped videos of Osama Bin Laden--nothing. In fact, even the Bush/Cheney group doesn't even mention him anymore. What's up with that?

[chephzibah]

the glee in bush's eyes the first week of 911 was so transparent, if that wasn't enough to tell me he done it, the very buzzword "911" was so grotesquely bushesque. he's planning another one you know, before the 08 elections. it will be prevented. the tyrant shall be apprehended soon.