INTERNATIONAL CITIZENS 9/11 WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL

911Video.org: Alfred Webre Announces the International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal.

               
 

Alfred Webre at the 2007 Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference -- "International Citizens 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal" Watch on GoogleVideo: http://tinyurl.com/39j7eq

COOPRADIO.ORG: Dr. Judy Wood & Canadian Inventor/Scientist John Hutchison on 9/11 & The Hutchison Effect

Jesse Ventura on 9/11 with Alex Jones 2008 -- Part 1 of 3

Japanese MP Yukihisa Fujita Speaks at 9/11 Truth Conference in Sydney

FYI Japan MP Fujita's 9/11 talk at the Oz 2008 Truth Now Conference. What Googlevideo has tried to censor!

9/11 WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL NOTE: "Pentagon seeks death penalty for alleged 9/11 planner"

9/11 WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL NOTE: The Hutchison Effect

JAPANESE PARLIAMENTARIAN DEMANDS NEW 9/11 INVESTIGATION:

911Video.org: Leuren Moret at the 2007 Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference -- "Depleted Uranium: 61 years of Uranium Wars" V911, DU, radiation

                 

Leuren Moret at the 2007 Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference -- "Depleted Uranium: 61 years of Uranium Wars" V911, DU, radiation

CANADA: Call for a New Investigation into the Events of September 11, 2001

Webster Tarpley: THE KENNEBUNKPORT WARNING AND THE ROGUE B-52: CONFIRMATION WITH A VENGEANCE//Kucinich Calls For B-52 Nuke,New 911 Investigations

Professors Make Legal Challenges to NIST 9/11 World Trade Centre Report/ Scholars' WTC Report Appeal acknowledged by NIST

http://www.prleap.com/pr/92756/
Professors Make Legal Challenges to NIST 9/11 World Trade Centre Report

(PRLEAP.COM) 7th Sept, 2007 Hot Springs Village - Arkansas, Clemson-SC,
Danbury-CT. In separate actions, 2 professors have initiated legal
challenges to the report that supposedly explained how and why World Trade
Centre towers 1 & 2 were destroyed on Sept 11 2001. Prof. Morgan Reynolds,
with various evidence, challenges the assumption that large jet planes hit
the towers. Prof. Wood has uncovered evidence which has allowed her to
declare that NCSTAR1 is ìfraudulent and deceptiveî.

In 2005, a number of reports were issued by NIST (National Institute of
Standards and Technology) which were meant to explain how the World Trade
Centre towers were completely destroyed. The challenged report is designated
NCSTAR 1 and runs some 298 pages. Dr. Judy Wood (formerly Professor of
Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University) has lodged a Request For
Correction, and a subsequent appeal, with NIST, with the help of a
Connecticut Attorney Jerry Leaphart. Dr. Morgan Reynolds, Professor
(Emeritus) of Economics at Texas A & M University and former Chief Economist
in the Dept. of Labor, also with the help of Jerry Leaphart, has initiated 2
separate actions against NIST.

The first action was initiated in March 2007 by Dr. Wood, in the form of a
"Request For Correction" (RFC) which declares that the main NIST WTC report
(NCSTAR1) is ìfraudulent and deceptiveî because it in no way accounts for
the profound level of destruction of the WTC towers ñ as illustrated in a
collection of over 65 photographs she has presented. Dr. Wood states that
ìNIST cannot make a statement that the World Trade Center towers came down
in ëfree fallí on one handî, and then say ìthat doing so is a form of
collapse.î Wood also states that ìUse of the descriptive word ëcollapseíî is
incorrect and Wood points out that according to NISTís own data, their
explanation of how the towers were pulverised does not satisfy the laws of
Physics. Dr. Wood, concludes from her study, that some type of Directed
Energy Weapon was used to destroy most of the WTC buildings. Dr. Wood also
points out that Applied Research Associates (ARA) were involved in the
production of some aspects of the NCSTAR reports and that they are a
manufacturer of Directed Energy Weapons and/or components of same. This
therefore would be one example of where there was a ìconflict of interestî
in producing a truthful report.

Even though NIST was supposed to have responded to each RFC within 60 days,
an ìextension of reviewî notification was posted on 29th June 2007 for both
Dr. Woodís and Dr. Reynoldsí RFCís.

Then, in a letter dated 27 July 2007, Catherine Fletcher of NIST rejected
Dr. Woodís original RFC, stating ìNIST has examined the photographs you
provided in conjunction with all the other evidence and has found that the
evidence does not support a theory involving directed energy weapons.î
Fletcher also stated, ìÖARA was determined not to have an organizational
conflict of interestî. Finally Fletcher stated, ìIn conclusion, NIST is
denying your request for correction because the NIST analysis of the
initiation of the collapse of the WTC towers was thorough and based on all
of the available evidence, and NIST continues to believe that the report is
not fraudulent, deceptive or misleading.î

The Data Quality Act, however, includes a ìright of appealî against the
decision and Dr. Wood has worked to further document a significant conflict
of interest between ARA and some of the analyses NIST used in their reports.
In the appeal, dated August 22nd 2007, Dr. Wood makes 6 key assertions and
states that ìNIST should have known that Applied Research Associates (ARA)
is a ësignificant manufacturer of directed energy weapons and/or components
thereofíî Additionally, Dr. Wood states ìNIST should have detected evidence
of the use of such weaponry even in the context of NISTís intentional and, I
assert, improper limitation of its investigation into ëthe sequence of
events leading up to the ëcollapseí of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers.
íî A response to this appeal is now pending.

Dr. Reynoldsí RFC outlines how NCSTAR1 failed to properly explain the
observed damage caused by the supposed plane impacts. He challenges the true
nature of the impacts based on a number of points of evidence. Reynolds
states that NIST produced plane animations which showed ìNo significant
deceleration as each jetliner entered a towerî and he points out that data
used in the associated analysis is inconsistent.

Overall, considering the evidence discussed in NCSTAR1, Reynolds states:
ìThese purported phenomena, [as mentioned above and as] described by NIST
and its contractors, are not independently verifiable and do not have a
scientifically valid basis for making the assumption that the simulated
conditions could actually have occurred. Equally significant, the
preparation of simulations that depict conditions that violate scientific
principles serves only to mislead and to set the conditions for false
conclusions to be enunciated.î

NIST has still not issued a response to Dr. Reynoldsí RFC - some 5 months
later (only the ìextension of reviewî notification).

In an action which is directly related to the RFC, Dr. Reynolds, also under
the guidance of Jerry Leaphart, has now initiated a Law Suit against NIST.
Dr. Reynoldsí ìQui Tamî complaint, filed on 11th July 2007 in United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York, lists 81 points in 7
ìcauses of actionî. The 34-page document is framed as Dr.. Morgan O.
Reynolds, on behalf of the United States of America vs Science Applications
International Corp., Applied Research Associates, Inc., Boeing, Silverstein
Properties, American Airlines, United Airlines and others. Its stated aim is
to ìrecover treble damages and civil penalties under the False Claims Act,
31 U.S.C. ßß 3729-33 and to recover all available damages and other monetary
relief under the common law or equitable theories of unjust enrichment,
payment under mistake of fact, recoupment of overpayments and common law
fraud.î

The action charges that ìdefendants knowingly concealed, or failed to
disclose, or caused others to fail to disclose material informationî and
that the reports produced ìintentionally did not satisfy, the mandate that
NIST had, which was that of determining what caused the destruction of
WTC1,2.î

It also charges that NISTís ìdocumentation serves solely to mislead,
obfuscate and provide a vehicle for the intended fraud; namely, that of
steering NIST away from a consideration of what caused the destruction of
WTC1,2; which, as elsewhere elaborated upon, was the use on 9/11/01 of
exotic weaponry known as directed energy weapons.î

Further developments in this case are now awaited.

For more information, contact the named individuals using the details below.

Jerry Leaphart, Jerry V. Leaphart & Assoc., P.C. 8 West Street, Suite 203
Danbury, CT 06810 phone - (203) 825-6265 , fax ñ (203) 825-6256, e-mail:
jsleaphart@cs.com

Dr. Judy Wood: lisajudy@nctv.com, www.drjudywood.com

Dr. Morgan Reynolds: econrn@suddenlink.net , www.nomoregames.net

Dr. Woodís RFC: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html

Dr. Woodís Appeal: http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html#wood

Dr. Reynoldsí RFC:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html#reynolds

Dr. Reynoldsí Qui Tam Action in full:
http://nomoregames.net/911/federal_case/07cv4612unsealedcomplaint.pdf

NISTís filings of the RFCís and responses, including separate actions by
Edward Haas and James Gourley can be found at:
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandPrograms/Information_Quality/PROD01_00
2619

=====

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_jim_fetz_070928_scholars__wtc_report
.htm

September 29, 2007

Scholars' WTC Report Appeal acknowledged by NIST

By Jim Fetzer

Madison, WI (OpEdNews) 29 September 2007 - In March 2007, Dr. Judy Wood,
formerly of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson and a member
of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, formally challenged the governmentís official
explanation (jet impacts and resulting fires) for the destruction of the WTC
complex. This was done in the form of a Request for Correction (RFC)
relative to the Data Quality Act (DQA) under the guidance of Connecticut
Attorney Jerry Leaphart. The National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) specifically acknowledged that it understood that Dr. Wood asserted
that directed energy weapons (DEW) were used to destroy the Twin Towers of
the World Trade Center complex. As well, NIST acknowledged that it did not
analyze that part of the event where the destructive effects referenced by
Dr. Wood would have been taking place.

NIST also acknowledged that it understood that Dr. Wood was asserting that
some of NISTís contractors were in a position to confirm the use of DEW
precisely because they, themselves, were manufacturers and developers of
such weaponry. Among the contractors that NIST utilized to help it prepare
the NCSTAR 1 report, for which corrections were sought, was Applied Research
Associates, Inc., which, it turns out, is a founding sponsor of the Directed
Energy Professional Society (DEPS).

Other sponsors of DEPS were also substantially involved in the preparation
of NCSTAR 1 for NIST, including Science Applications International Corp
(SAIC). NIST indicated that while it did a background check to assure there
were no conflicts of interest, it did not know that ARA was a manufacturer
of DEW. In her appeal, Dr. Wood presents ample information confirming that
NIST should have known of ARAís involvement with DEW. Significantly, NIST
has acknowledged Dr. Woodís appeal by posting a copy on its Website.  James
H. Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, observed, ìThis means they
are taking it seriously.î

In 2005, a number of reports were issued by NIST that were meant to explain
how the Twin Towers were completely destroyed. Its basic report, designated
NCSTAR 1, runs around 298 pages. She was able to pursue these issues under
the DQA, because it directs the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to
issue government-wide guidelines that ìprovide policy and procedural
guidance to Federal agencies for ensuring and maximizing the quality,
objectivity, utility, and integrity of information (including statistical
information) disseminated by Federal agencies.î

On July 27, 2007, Attorney Jerry Leaphart observed on ìThe Dynamic Duoî, a
radio program hosted by Kevin Barrett, Ph.D., on GCN (gcnlive.com), ìWhat I
can tell you and the listeners, Kevin, is this. There is more admissible
evidence associated with the theory that the World Trade Center was
destroyed by directed energy weapons than there is admissible evidence for
any single other theory out there that has been promulgated.î Go to
http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFC_Adm.mp3 . Fetzer, who
co-hosts the program with Barrett, emphasized that this is a very important
step on behalf of an alternative account of the mode of destruction of the
WTC. ìIndeed,î he said, ìthe official account now hangs by very slender
threads.î

The first action initiated by Dr. Wood occurred in March 2007 in the form of
an RFC declaring that NCSTAR 1 is ìfraudulent and deceptiveî because it
cannot account for the profound destruction of the World Trade Center,
including the massive pulverization of the towers, which she has documented
on her web site, http://drjudywood.com . She observes, ìNIST cannot make a
statement that the World Trade Center towers came down in ëfree fall,í on
the one hand, and then say that doing so is a form of ëcollapse,í on the
other.î According to Fetzer, not only is the use of the word ìcollapseî
inaccurate but the official account does not satisfy the laws of physics and
of engineering.

Several studies demonstrating that The 9/11 Commission Report (2004) is not
true have been published in The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), which Fetzer edited.
From her analysis of the breadth and the depth of damage inflicted upon the
WTC, Dr. Wood has concluded that some type of directed energy weapon (DEW)
was involved in the destruction of the WTC buildings. She has also pointed
out that Applied Research Associates (ARA) was a contractor in the
preparation of some aspects of the NCSTAR reports and that ARA is also a
manufacturer of directed energy weapons, which constitutes a probable
ìconflict of interestî in producing a truthful account of what happened
here.

In a letter dated July 27, 2007, Catherine Fletcher of NIST commented on Dr.
Woodís original RFC, stating, ìNIST has examined the photographs you
provided in conjunction with all the other evidence and has found that the
evidence does not support a theory involving directed energy weapons.î She
also stated, ìARA was determined not to have an organizational conflict of
interestî. Finally, she added, ìNIST is denying your request for correction
because the NIST analysis of the initiation of the collapse of the WTC
towers was thorough and based on all of the available evidence, and NIST
continues to believe that the report is not fraudulent, deceptive or
misleading.î

The Data Quality Act, however, includes a ìright of appealî of NISTís
response and Dr. Wood has worked to further document a significant conflict
of interest between ARA and some of the analyses NIST used in its reports.
In her appeal of August 22, 2007, Dr. Wood makes six key assertions,
including that NIST should have known that Applied Research Associates (ARA)
is ìa significant manufacturer of directed energy weapons and/or components
thereof.î Additionally, Dr. Wood states, ìNIST should have detected evidence
of the use of such weaponry even in the context of NISTís intentional and, I
assert, improper limitation of its investigation into ëthe sequence of
events leading up to the ëcollapseí of the Twin Towers.íî

Fetzer said that a formal acknowledgement of the appeal has been posted in
two parts at
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandPrograms/Information_Quality/PROD01_00
2619 , which is the governmentís official web site. Due to technical issues,
some of the documents are not available in their entirety. These will be
corrected in time. Meanwhile the documents are available at
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html#wood . The posted
versions, however, do not reproduce the evidence Dr. Wood has submitted, but
only inferior black-and-white versions of photos. These photos may be viewed
in higher resolution on her site,
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html#wood . ìIt is unfortunate
that NIST has chosen to post a version with low quality pictures and in
black and white,î she observed. ìSome of the data referenced in the appeal
can only be properly evaluated when viewed in color and with good quality
reproduction.î

The appeal may be found at
http://drjudywood.com/pdf/070822_RFC_Appeal17a_JW.pdf .
ìI donít know why NIST did not simply post the higher quality color images,î
Fetzer said, ìbut they are available to the agency and to the public by
means of her web site. The course of this appeal should be interesting.î
According to him, Dr. Wood is the leading scientist who is investigating the
destruction of the WTC. ìJudyís credentials are impeccable,î he said. ìShe
is an admirable example of what an expert can produce. Anyone who wants to
understand what happened to the WTC should visit her web site. NIST has a
great deal to learn from her.î

Authors Website: 911scholars.org

Authors Bio: Founder, Scholars for 9/11 Truth

URL of this article: http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/10/professors-make.html

Announcement Of 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

Announcement Of 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

911Video.org: Alfred Webre/Leuren Moret Announce the International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal.
Alfred Webre at the 2007 Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference --

"International Citizens 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal"

Watch on GoogleVideo: http://tinyurl.com/39j7eq

Watch at 9/11 Tribunal Website:

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal: http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/

Leuren Moret at the 2007 Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference -- "Depleted Uranium: 61 years of Uranium Wars"

Watch on Google Video:  http://tinyurl.com/24rgtx

Leuren Moret & David Ray Griffin on the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act. Vancouver COOP RADIO CFRO 102.7 FM   HOST: Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd

http://www.topcomp.ca/bb/2006-01-23.mp3

International Lawyer Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, who is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal, will make a public call for an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal.  He will speak at Ready for Mainstream, a 9/11 Anniversary Conference (Sept.8-9, 2007) at Cooper Union, 7th St and 4th Avenue, New York.

Information:  http://www.ready4mainstream.ny911truth.org/index.html

According to Independent Scientist Leuren Moret and Alfred Webre, 9/11 was a False Flag Operation to provide a pretext to engage in Genocidal & Ecocidal Depleted Uranium (DU) bombing of Central Asia (Afghanistan and Iraq) in order to secure vast oil and uranium reserves; to roll out a Terror-based National Security state-system world-wide; to implement the final stages of a world Depopulation policy; and to trigger a World War III conflagration. 

Since 1945, under the Nuremberg Principles, causing aggressive war constitutes the most serious of War Crimes. 

As a matter of law, there is a sufficient quantum of evidence for the appointment of an independent prosecutor under Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute treason against President GW Bush; Vice President Richard B. Cheney; and the Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld for the armed attack upon the United States on September 11, 2001, in the guise of a False Flag Operation.

U.S. Congress fails to Act

The establishment of an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is justified, given that official institutions in the U.S. have failed to assign legal accountability for the False Flag Operation of 9/11.  Representative John Conyers, Jr., Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee and his senior staff personally reviewed the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act and Congressional Memorandum following the 2006 U.S. Mid-term Election and Senior Staff met twice with representatives of the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act.  The Chairman refused to introduce the Act, despite support for the Act by his Senior Staff.  The 9/11 Commission failed to take testimony under oath from Bush and Cheney, and reached fraudulent conclusions.

9/11 As A War Crime

The False Flag Operation of 9/11 was the pretext for, and an integral part of the planning and execution of the illegal War of Aggression in 2001 against Afghanistan and of War Crimes committed by the United States in Afghanistan, as found by the Final Judgment, International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan at Tokyo. The Court found the use of Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons in Afghanistan to constitute War Crimes, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and Omnicide.  The False Flag Operation of 9/11 is a legal component of these War Crimes, and the perpetrators of 9/11 are guilty Aggressive War, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and War Crimes.

Information:

9/11 War Crimes Tribunal:
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/

URL of this article:

http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/08/announcement-of.html

A Civil Defense Mini-Manual to Resisting and Defeating Illegal Occupation by Martial Law: How to use Martial Law Against the Dummies

A Civil Defense Mini-Manual to Resisting and Defeating Illegal Occupation by Martial Law: How to use Martial Law Against the Dummies

BY ALFRED LAMBREMONT WEBRE, JD, MEd

         

Martial law – "Military government involving the suspension of ordinary law". Oxford
           American Dictionary.

VANCOUVER, B.C. – A matrix of martial law legislation and Executive Orders of the Bush Administration is now in place for the abolition of constitutional democracy, the re-location, incarceration, and depopulation of the North American public, and the illegal expropriation of its property. 

The matrix (the “Depopulation matrix”) is designed to be activated by a false flag state terror attack against a major urban center in the U.S., possibly using nuclear or biological weapons.

False Flag Operations, The Police State Road Map & The Depopulation Policy – Setting the Stage

The Police State Road Map states why martial law – military government - is now trying to occupy the USA.

“From recent pronouncements and legislative developments it appears both the U.S. and U.K. governments may suspend Parliamentary democracy after the next major terror attack.  With the War on Terror expected to go on forever, we may soon find ourselves under a form of indefinite martial law.  What is likely to be the purpose of this scenario for the police state planners?  The populace will be required to surrender rights to life, liberty and property for short term expediency.  This will be the window of opportunity the planners need to purge dissident groups and exploit the popular panic to introduce permanent legal or constitutional changes.”   Chapter 10, Martial Law, The Police State Road Map.

Depopulation is the deeper reason for military government.  Terms like “Martial Law,” “New World Order,” “Security & Prosperity Partnership” are “code words” for a Depopulation policy to reduce global population by between 2 billion and 4 billion persons.  The False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001 was engineered by an international war crimes racketeering organization to implement the final stages of a world Depopulation policy.

Martial Law: The Depopulation Legal Matrix

The Depopulation legal matrix is itself a False Flag Operation against our constitutional democracy.  There is no functional reason to cancel constitutional democracy and the Bill of Rights in the USA, other than the imposition of a police state for the purpose of Depopulation.

•    USA PATRIOT ACT (Signed by GW Bush on October 26, 2001) – Undercuts freedoms guaranteed in the Bill of Rights: First Amendment - Freedom of religion, speech, assembly, and the press; Fourth Amendment - Freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures; Fifth Amendment - No person to be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law; Sixth Amendment - Right to a speedy public trial by an impartial jury, right to be informed of the facts of the accusation, right to confront witnesses and have the assistance of counsel; Eighth Amendment - No excessive bail or cruel and unusual punishment shall be imposed; Fourteenth Amendment - All persons (citizens and noncitizens) within the US are entitled to due process and the equal protection of the laws.

•    North American Union/ Security & Prosperity Partnership (SPP) (Signed March 23, 2005) –The SPP is a regulatory structure for implementing the legal matrix of the Depopulation policy in North America (Canada-USA-Mexico).  SPP is now integrating monetary (the “Amero” common currency) and security regulations.  A false flag state terror attack would activate the Depopulation legal matrix in Canada, Mexico and the USA under a USA central military government.

•    Military Commissions Act (Signed September 28, 2006) – Eliminates the right of Habeas Corpus and allows for military arrest, prosecution, imprisonment and execution of US Citizens as “Enemy Combatants.” Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman has stated, "The [Military Commissions Act]....authorizes the president to seize American citizens as enemy combatants, even if they have never left the United States. And once thrown into military prison, they cannot expect a trial by their peers or any other of the normal protections of the Bill of Rights."

•    John Warner Defense Authorization Act (Passed September 30, 2006) – Undercuts the Posse Comitatus Act prohibiting the use of troops in the United States.  Renames the Insurrection Act of 1807 as the Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order Act.  Expands the power of the President to deploy troops in the USA to include “natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition”—and such “condition” is not defined or limited.  The Insurrection Act authorizes the president to deploy troops within the United States only “to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy.”

•    National Security Presidential Directive 51 (May 9, 2007) – Authorizes U.S. President to assume dictatorial control of Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branches of government and direct all private sector activities, in the event of a “catastrophic emergency,” defined as "any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions."

•    Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq  (July 17, 2007) -  On its face, this Executive Order grants GW Bush the right to seize the property of any person deemed to have threatened the peace in Iraq.  It is so vague that peacemarchers could be targeted by the order.  Yet, given the electoral results of the 2006 Mid-term Election, and evidence suggesting that occupation by US and UK troops in Iraq is actually destabilizing the region, an independent court applying the Order could reasonably find that the personal property of George W. Bush be seized.

Nurture the Body Politic

The matrix can be defeated by our taking active part in the body politic, infusing vital, popular energy into our constitutional democracy:

•    Become personally involved in the 2008 electoral process on the anti-Depopulation matrix platform – There are over 550,000 elected political offices in the USA.  Run for office; work for a candidate, at the municipal, county, state, federal level.

•    Aggressively seek removal of U.S. President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard B. Cheney through the constitutional means of Article II Impeachment or Article III criminal prosecution for treason in the 9/11 false flag attack on the USA.

•    Publicize the Depopulation matrix’s existence and attack the constitutionality and legitimacy of its component false flag “laws and Executive Orders” at every opportunity in every available arena. 

•    Create community phone and email trees to coordinate information and resistance in the event of a False Flag attack by the Bush Administration on the population of the USA.

__________
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, a graduate of Yale University and Yale Law School, is International Director of the Institute for Cooperation in Space, is a former cooperating attorney with the New York Civil Liberties Union (where he defended an SDS member in the 1969 Panther 21 case), has taught Civil Liberties at the University of Texas (Government Department), and is a Judge on the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal.  Alfred is the author of EXOPOLITICS: POLITICS, GOVERNMENT AND LAW IN THE UNIVERSE.  His website is www.peaceinspace.org.  Alfred can be reached at peace@peaceinspace.org.

REFERENCES

The Police State Road Map by Michael Nield (March 2005 Edition).  www.policestateplanning.com (PDF free e-book 201 pages); See also; The Police State Road Map – Essential Reading, http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/cgi/page.cgi?aid=612&_id=128&zine=show

From Hiroshima to Iraq, 61 years of uranium wars, A suicidal, genocidal, omnicidal course by Leuren Moret, Global Research, June 12, 2007
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=MOR20070612&articleId=5949

“Proposal for a International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal,” Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd, Vancouver 911 Truth Conference, June 24, 2007, Vancouver, BC.

“Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001” (Public Law 107-56), USA PATRIOT Act , which President George W. Bush signed into law on October 26, 2001. See American Civil Liberties Union Summary of PATRIOT Act.
Timeline of the progress toward a North American Union, http://www.vivelecanada.ca/staticpages/index.php/20060830133702539

Military Commissions Act of 2006 (passed by Congress), S.3930, September 22, 2006; Prof. Bruce Ackerman quoted in Los Angeles Times, http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-ackerman28sep28,0,619852.story?coll=la-opinion-rightrail

H.R. 5122--109th Congress (2006): John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007;

“Bush Moves Toward Martial Law” by Frank Morales. http://www.informationliberation.com/index.php?id=17432

“Martial Law Working for the Clampdown” By James Bovard http://zmagsite.zmag.org/JulAug2007/bovard.html

NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51. HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/HSPD-20. Subject: National Continuity Policy. www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html

Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq  (July 17, 2007) www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-3.html

As published in the San Francisco Bay View, Aug. 7, 2007 (PRINT EDITION)
http://www.sfbayview.com

URL of this article:

http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/08/a-civil-defense.html

MEDIA ADVISORY: Independent Scientist Leuren Moret and International Lawyer Alfred Webre call for International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

International Citizen’s 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal

VANCOUVER, B.C. - In order to prosecute the 9/11 perpetrators under the 9/11 Independent Prosecutors Act,  Independent Scientist/DU Radiation Expert Leuren Moret and International Lawyer Alfred Webre will call for the establishment of an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, in a public announcement to be made at the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference on Sunday June 24, 2007.

According to Moret and Webre, 9/11 was a False Flag Operation by an international War Crimes Racketeering Organization, to provide a pretext to engage in Genocidal & Ecocidal Depleted Uranium (DU) bombing of Central Asia (Afghanistan and Iraq) in order to secure vast oil and uranium reserves; to roll out a Terror-based National Security state-system world-wide; and to implement the final stages of a world Depopulation policy. 

The purpose of the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal is to criminalize war, and to enforce the prohibitions of Aggressive war and War Crimes, which since 1945 have been prohibited by the Nuremberg Principles, through a permanent citizen’s war crimes tribunal and through the principles of Natural law, restorative justice, and International law.

Alfred Lambremont Webre JD, MEd, an international lawyer and Member of the Pro Tem Committee for the Kuala Lumpur International War Crimes Tribunal to be held in 2008, will make the announcement in an address to the Vancouver 9/11 Truth Conference, on the issue of "The International 9/11 Citizen's War Crimes Tribunal: The 9/11 False Flag Operation as a War Crime under International Law."


DATE/TIME OF 9/11 WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL ANNOUNCEMENT:

Sunday, June 24, 2007 at 6PM PDT @ Main Stage
The Maritime Labour Centre
1880 Triumph St., Vancouver, B.C. V5L 1K3
CANADA

The purpose of the 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is to prosecute the perpetrators of the False Flag Operation of September 11, 2001, under the prima facie evidence assembled for the 9/11 Independent Prosecutors Act for War Crimes, including Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and Crimes Against Peace (now Aggressive War), as set out in the Nuremberg Principles, the Geneva Conventions, and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

The 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act appoints an Independent Prosecutor under the authority of Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute Treason against the United States of America by U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and other John and Jane Does for planning and carrying out the acts of treason, as defined in Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out, and/or causing to be carried out an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001, as part of a False Flag Operation. Article III of the U.S. Constitution provides that, "Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort...."

The main grounds for concluding that there is prima facie evidence that the named individuals - U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld - abused the power of their office and committed Article III Treason on September 11, 2001 are contained in a Legislative Memorandum to the U.S. Congress accompanying the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act.  This Legislative Memorandum was co-authored by expert researcher David Ray Griffin, independent scientist Leuren Moret and attorney Alfred Webre.

The facts recited in the Congressional Memorandum constitute prima facie evidence that the named individuals---U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld---and other John and Jane Does are independently and jointly guilty of Treason against these United States under Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution.   For the full Congressional Memorandum, go to:

Congressional Memorandum: Summary of Prima Facie Evidence of Treason
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/04/memorandum_summ.html

A Summary of the threshold of prima facie evidence is as follows.

I. The attacks of 9/11, as portrayed in the official account, could not have succeeded if standard operating procedures between the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and NORAD had been followed. The Pentagon, under the leadership of Donald Rumsfeld, has provided three mutually inconsistent accounts of NORAD’s response, which means that at least two of them are false. Moreover, the third account, articulated by the 9/11 Commission, is contradicted by a wide range of facts, including evidence that the FAA had notified NORAD in a timely fashion. There must have been stand-down orders, and these could have come only from the highest levels of the Pentagon and the White House.

II. Overwhelming evidence exists that the collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 were instances of controlled demolition, and/or of the application of exotic weapons such as land-based, air-based or possible space-based Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). But al-Qaeda operatives could not have obtained the needed access to the buildings to plant the explosives and would not have ensured that the buildings come straight down. Nor could al-Qaeda operatives have obtained command and control of advanced Directed Energy Weapons, Microfusion devices (4th generation mini-nuclear weapons), bunker-busters, or other exotic weapons alternatives that are known to be in the deployment or testing phase in the US Defense arsenal. The controlled demolition and/or Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) or exotic weapons application, therefore, had to be the work of U.S. Government and other insiders.  That President Bush was one of those insiders is suggested by the fact that his brother and cousin were principals in the company in charge of WTC security. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by the removal of evidence (the collapsed steel), which at a crime scene is normally a federal offense. Finally, if the airplane strikes could have occurred only with the consent of the President and the Secretary of Defense (as suggested in the previous point), the coordination of these strikes with the demolition of the buildings - and/or with the use of exotic weapons such as Directed Energy Weapons -  implies their involvement in the latter as well.   

The design of the International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is to provide a judicial, impartial forum for the evaluation of forensic evidence.

At present, there are several alternative, though not mutually exclusive models of how the WTC Towers fell, in a controlled demolition. While there is compelling evidence for one model over another at this time, the purpose of an impartial forum is to allow evidence to be presented. This includes evidence of traditional chemical means of controlled demolition, as well as more exotic means, as warranted by the forensic evidence. The models of controlled demolition to be explored, thus would include at least: traditional thermite and thermate exposives; Microfusion devices (4th generation nuclear weapons); and Directed Energy Weapons (DEW), be they land-based, air-based, or space-based. Correspondence with the USAF Kirtland Base Directed Energy Directorate does not rule out the existence of Directed Energy Weapons in these configurations.

III. Overwhelming evidence also exists for the conclusion that the attack on the Pentagon was an inside job. That the official story could not be true is evident from many facts: Alleged hijacker Hani Hanjour’s incompetence; the choice of the Pentagon west wing as the target; the impossibility of a commercial airliner’s coming back to Washington undetected and hitting the Pentagon unless permitted; and the lack of physical evidence consistent with an attack by a Boeing 757. That the strike was an inside job is implied by the falsity of the official story, the evidence that the strike was made by a military aircraft, the removal of evidence, and the government’s refusal to release videos of the strike. This operation could hardly have been planned without the involvement of Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld.

9/11 & DU at the Pentagon

In April, 2007, Leuren Moret exposed the U.S. military’s illegal use of Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons in target practice in Hawaii, in violation of U.S. military environmental regulations.  The elevated radiation readings she recorded were carried by ABC-TV news in Hawaii on April 29 & 30, 2007.

Leuren Moret reported similar elevated radiation readings downwind from the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001.  Two days after 9/11, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) confirmed that the Pentagon crash site rubble was radioactive and that the probable contaminant was Depleted Uranium (DU). The entry and exit holes through the Pentagon crash site were the signature of a kinetic energy penetrator, such as a Cruise missile, and the term “punch-out hole” was written by crash site investigators over the exit hole.  This is a military term used for kinetic energy penetrators.   Major Doug Rokke, former Director of the Gulf War I DU Cleanup Team, reported that an email from the Pentagon 30 minutes after impact confirmed a Cruise missile hit the Pentagon on 9/11.  Recently vast Uranium deposits have been reported in Khazakhstan and Afghanistan. Khazakhstan is expected to out-produce Canada (now the world's top producer) in Uranium production within 12 years. This exposes the economic interests behind the events of 9/11, specifically the unjustified military attack by the U.S. on Afghanistan using 9/11 as a pretext.

IV. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by President Bush’s remaining at the Florida Elementary school after it was evident---given the truth of the official account---that the United States was experiencing a surprise attack. This behavior makes sense only if Bush and his lead Secret Service agent knew that there would be no attack on the school.

V. The complicity of Vice President Cheney in the attack on the Pentagon and the downing of Flight 93 is implied by the testimony of Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta in conjunction with the false claims of the 9/11 Commission, under the guidance of administration insider Philip Zelikow, as to when Cheney went to the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) and when he issued the shoot-down authorization.

VI. The conclusion from the evidence that members of the Bush administration orchestrated the attacks of 9/11 is reinforced by the fact that they had some huge projects---prosecuting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and obtaining funding to accelerate the technological transformation of the military---that would likely be possible only in the event of “a new Pearl Harbor.”

The establishment of an International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal is justified, given that official institutions in the U.S. have failed to assign legal accountability for the False Flag Operation of 9/11.  Representative John Conyers, Jr., Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee and his senior staff personally reviewed the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act and Congressional Memorandum following the 2006 U.S. Mid-term Election and Senior Staff met twice with representatives of the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act.  The Chairman refused to introduce the Act, despite support for the Act by his Senior Staff.  The 9/11 Commission failed to take testimony under oath from Bush and Cheney, and reached fraudulent conclusions.

9/11 As A War Crime

The False Flag Operation of 9/11 was the pretext for, and an integral part of the planning and execution of the illegal War of Aggression in 2001 against Afghanistan and of War Crimes committed by the United States in Afghanistan, as found by the Final Judgment, International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan at Tokyo. The Court found the use of Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons in Afghanistan to constitute War Crimes, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and Omnicide.  The False Flag Operation of 9/11 is a legal component of these War Crimes, and the perpetrators of 9/11 are guilty Aggressive War, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, and War Crimes.


MEDIA ADVISORY:
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/06/international_l.html

International 9/11 Citizen's War Crimes Tribunal
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/

References:

9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act - Executive Summary
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/06/executive_summa.html

Congressional Memorandum: Summary of Prima Facie Evidence of Treason
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/04/memorandum_summ.html

9/11 Disappearing Explosions - Brasscheck TV (Video)
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/110.html

Leuren Moret – Bio
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/nuclear_free_zone/2007/05/leuren_moret_bi.html

Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd - Bio
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Webre

KITV Hawaii - Depleted Uranium Hawaii (2 Mins 33 Seconds)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L94IUSw54pQ

Leuren Moret – Expert Testimony at the Tokyo International Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/nuclear_free_zone/2007/05/du_depleted_ura.html

DU: Dirty Bombs, Missiles, Bullets by Leuren Moret
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/DU/DU_DBDMDB.html

From Hiroshima to Iraq, 61 years of uranium wars,
A suicidal, genocidal, omnicidal course by Leuren Moret
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=5949

CONTACT:

Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
Campaign for Cooperation in Space
Tel: 604-733-8134
Email: peace@peaceinspace.org      

International Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/         

#  #  #  #  # 

URL of this article:

http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2007/06/international_l.html

Most Important Videos I've Ever Seen - These Explain Everything!

I thought I had seen it all, read it all, heard it all.  That was until I saw the following two videos.

   

Taken from a May 5, 2007 speech called "The Knowledge Exchange" filmed in New Westminster, B.C., Canada by Alfred L Webre, J.D., M.Ed., the videos explain the reasons for US wars since the first World War.  The films also expose the history and rationale of many of the war crimes against humanity that are led by those in positions in power in the US with the assistance of international war crimes racketeers. Such war crimes include the False Flag Operation of 9/11, Depleted Uranium, and numerous other grievous offenses being committed against innocent citizens of the world.

 

In less than the time it takes to watch a movie at the local theater, I guarantee that these films, each less than one hour in length, will teach you some things you did not already know.  They cost nothing to watch but explain everything.  

 

These eye-opening videos, featuring the highly knowledgeable and well-spoken Webre, should be required viewing for every high school student, as they educate Americans about the real story of US history, our political system, and war-making orchestrations.  None of this information, supremely critical to every American, is ever taught in the US public education system, the mainstream media, or on television.

 

Watch them quickly and please forward this along widely.  

 

Part One 

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4744924856627627790

Part Two 

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=3895674382259647296

 

To find out about the upcoming Citizen's 9/11 War Crimes Tribunal, 

visit: http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/ .

 

Thank you in advance.